JF-17 Thunder vs Rafale Fighter Jets is a comparison that every defense expert is analyzing.
Indian Air Force (IAF) chief recently warned about the shortcomings of the Rafale fighter jets in a probable comparison to the JF-17 Thunder. This statement came exactly a year after Pakistan outgunned India’s top fighter jet in Balakot.
According to the Global Times and secondary research by the EurAsian Times, the latest, powered-up version of the JF-17 fighter jet reportedly features technologies from China’s high-end J-20 fighter jet that will immensely boost its combat efficiency.
According to pictures shared on various social media platforms, the JF-17 aircraft is equipped with many commercial off-the-shelf technologies from China’s state-owned Aviation Industry Corporation.
These include a new, larger holographic wide-angle head-up display and an integrated cockpit display comparable to the one used by the J-20, as well as an advanced infrared missile approach warning system used by J-20 fighter jets.
Analysts said the new additions to the JF-17 can give pilots more situational awareness, permitting them to concentrate more on combat instead of flying the aircraft.
In March 2019, Yang Wei, the fighter jet’s chief designer, said development and production of the JF-17 Block 3 were underway, and the third block would enhance the JF-17’s information-based warfare capability and weapons.
PL-15 Missiles For JF-17
The reports regarding the deployment of longer-ranged Chinese PL-15 missiles on an upgraded JF-17 jet have caused anxiety in the Indian Air Force. Global Times earlier reported that the upgraded JF-17 will host an infrared search-and-track system along with a cross-section radar that lessens the pseudo-stealthy airframe. The PL-15’s beyond-visual-range missile has reportedly also caused serious worry in the Pentagon.
How Muhammad Ghori & Prithvi Raj Chauhan Are Still Alive With Indian, Pakistani Military Doctrine?
The PL-15’s striking range in actual aerial engagements is definitely lower than the maximum range of 300 km but is nevertheless much greater than the US’ AIM-120 AMRAAM, estimated to be approximately 180 km.
US general Herbert Carlisle voiced serious concerns in 2015 when the development of the PL-15 entered the public domain: “Look at our adversaries and what they’re developing, things like the PL-15 and the range of that weapon.” General Carlisle raised the same issue in an interview with FlightGlobal: “The PL-15 and the range of that missile, we’ve got to be able to out-stick that missile.”
Indian Media Wakes-Up After 30 Years To Cover Kashmiri Pandit Genocide
The PL-15 missile, a radar-guided weapon, is advertised as having a greater range than both the US-built AMRAAM and the Russian R-77, which is in service with the Indian Air Force.
At over 4 meters long, the PL-15 is much longer than the AMRAAM and has a powerful radar and rocket motor. Experts writing for EurAsian Times maintain that the fundamental role of the PL-15 is to demolish ‘high-value’ targets such as airborne early-warning aircraft (AWACS) and aerial refueling aircraft, which could handicap any opponent, including the US.
Why India Took Almost 30 Years To Charge Yasin Malik For The Murder Of IAF Officials?
The PL-15 uses a conventional rocket motor, unlike the Meteor missile, which the IAF will use on Rafale fighter jets. The Meteor has a stated range of “well in excess of 150km,” according to its manufacturers, but it is also shorter than the PL-15.
Therefore, experts speaking to the EurAsian Times conclude that the PL-15 has a greater range than the Meteor because of its higher fuel capacity and poses a serious threat to the French-origin jets that will be operated by the Indian Air Force.
Nitin J Ticku is a MARCOM specialist with a deep interest in Education, Defense and Geopolitics. Nitin holds a double master’s degree in Business Management and Journalism and is a frequent contributor to the EurAsian Times.
