NASAMS (National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System) had a 100% success rate in Ukraine thwarting Russian attacks, US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said on Wednesday.
Austin also said that the NASAMS that the US had sent to Ukraine are fully operational, and performance has been very impressive.
“I’m pleased to be able to report that the NASAMS air defense systems that we’ve sent to Ukraine are now operational, and their performance so far has been very impressive,” Austin told reporters after a virtual meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group.
Earlier, US Defense Department spokesperson Pat Ryder had confirmed that two National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS) had been delivered and deployed for operation in Ukraine. “The systems [NASAMS] are now in Ukraine and operational,” Ryder said during a press briefing.
The United States has committed a total of eight NASAMS systems to Ukraine amid its battle with Russia. The other six air defense systems are not expected to be delivered anytime soon, according to Pentagon officials.
NASAMS are short-to-medium-range ground-based air defense systems that can defend against drones, helicopters, cruise missiles, and aircraft.
Meanwhile, Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Lieutenant-General Igor Konashenkov said that the military had struck Ukrainian positions using high-precision missiles against military command posts and associated energy infrastructure.
The Russian Defense Ministry showed footage of a salvo launch of Kalibr cruise missiles from the Project 11356R frigate against military facilities in Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/z4zavkh8zf
— Massimo Frantarelli (@MrFrantarelli) November 16, 2022
The goals of the massive strike were achieved, and all the missiles accurately hit the specified targets, the general highlighted. The video above demonstrates the launch of at least three Kalibr cruise missiles from a Project 11356 frigate.
The NASAMS uses the AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles adapted for ground launch. When launched from a warplane, the AMRAAM has high energy on launch, however, when launched from the ground, the AMRAAM has very little energy.
It has to climb and accelerate, expending its rocket motor fuel. As such, the range of the system is limited to around 30 kilometers. The system has no area defense capability.
The NASAMS is a point defense system developed to defend high-value targets. It is deployed around Washington, and at one point, India was set to deploy it around Delhi. (The Delhi deal likely fell through when MoD put missile systems on the import ban list.)
The NASAMS-2 variant, likely to be supplied to Ukraine, has a Link-16 data link. What that means is that the system needs no surveillance radar. It can be cued towards the target over a data link by an airborne surveillance asset.
To understand the significance of the Link-16 data link on NASAMS, we need to move a bit aside from the narrative.
NATO Surveillance Assets
The US and the UK have deployed airborne ISR assets to monitor Ukrainian territory and airspace. Aircraft participating in the 24×7 surveillance include:
USAF E-3 Sentry AWACS to monitor the airspace over Ukraine
USAF E-8 JSTARS for ground surveillance, battle management, and command and control aircraft
US Navy P-81 for SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) & Optical reconnaissance. (Remember how the IN Navy used its P-8I assets to monitor the PLA build-up in 2020, flying along the LAC),
US Army RC-12, for SIGINT
RQ-4D Phoenix for high-resolution synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensor-based surveillance. (The RQ-4D can survey as much as 40,000 square miles (100,000 sq kilometers) of terrain per day, an area the size of South Korea or Iceland.)
USAF RC-135S Cobra Ball to collect optical and electronic data on ballistic targets.
RC-135U Combat Sent to collect technical intelligence on adversary radar emitter systems
RC-135V/W for theatre lever SigInt. (Its sensor suite allows the mission crew to detect, identify and geolocate signals throughout the electromagnetic spectrum.)
During a media briefing on May 5, Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby confirmed the US was providing “battlefield intelligence” to help Ukrainians defend their country.
Impact Of Reconnaissance Assets
US ISR assets patrolling close to Ukraine are the single reason Ukraine is holding out against Russia. The assets provide Kyiv with a clear picture of the location of Russian forces and the deployment of Russian ground assets.
Using data from the ISR assets, Ukraine has been able to find gaps in Russian defenses and exploit them. The recent Ukrainian successes in the Kharkiv and Kherson regions wouldn’t have been possible without US ISR assets.
US E-3 Sentry likely detects and tracks Russian cruise missiles shortly after they enter Ukrainian airspace. Until now, Ukrainian ground-based AD weapons have not effectively leveraged the E-3’s ability to stream real-time targeting data on aerial threats to Ukrainian AD systems, which are not built to NATO standards.
When the NASAMS and German IRIS-T systems arrive, Ukraine can leverage the data streamed by E-3 aircraft over data links.
Battles are often won by outsmarting the enemy, not by outfighting him. Outsmarting the opponent requires good intelligence. Thanks to US ISR assets, Ukraine has good intelligence.
Russia’s intelligence-gathering capability, in comparison, is minimal. Its Tu-214R reconnaissance & SIGINT aircraft is roughly equivalent to the RC-135. However, Russia is known to have just 1-2 such operational aircraft. As such, they are incapable of maintaining a 24×7 vigil.
Russia uses Mi-8MPTR helicopters for intelligence gathering and EW. However, these are not theatre-level assets. Using them, Russia can best monitor Ukraine’s movements in East Ukraine.
However, given how Ukraine surprised Russia with its counter-offensive in Kharkiv, it can be easily concluded that Russian electronic eavesdropping capability in play is limited.
With its limited defense budget, Russia cannot afford a capability matching the US. Consequently, it has invested in developing long-range air and ground-based missiles that can take out adversary ISR assets.
The RVV-BD is one such missile. It has a range of 300 kilometers, weighs 500-kilogram, and features a 60-kilogram warhead! The missile combines data-link and inertial navigation for midcourse guidance. For terminal guidance, it uses jam-proof DRFM active radar homing. During the endgame, the missile is capable of 8g maneuvering flying at 6M!
As things stand, Russia is not attacking US/UK ISR assets because they are not flying in Ukrainian airspace, but that would change if NATO crosses a Russian red line.
NASAMS will definitely boost Russian cruise missile losses. But since the NASAMS is a short-range system and infrastructure, command & communication targets are many, a substantial number of NASAMS would be needed.
In some ways, the NASAMS sale is a US honeytrap. The system is very attractive but pricey. Once Ukraine invests in the system, it will have to keep augmenting its investment to secure more assets.
NASAMS is likely procured to protect the Ukrainian government and strong command and control centers, not infrastructure targets.
In the face of NASAMS deployment, likely, Russia will increasingly use a ballistic missile or Geran-2 suicide drones to hit infrastructure targets protected by NASAMS and IRIS-T. The Geran-2 drone has proved to be the wild card.
It’s slow-moving but very low observable due to its small size, radar frequency, low observable shaping, and near absence of heat signature. If Russia can ramp up Geran-2 production, it could prove a game changer, with or without NASAMS or no NASAMS.